The Contractual Impossibility of Unwinding Disney’s Reedy Creek

A great deal ado has been created about the legality of Florida’s Senate Bill 4C purporting to dissolve Disney’s Reedy Creek Improvement District: irrespective of whether it was retaliation prohibited by the 1st Amendment, irrespective of whether it was passed with ample formality, and so on. But there is a much far more standard cause Florida can not dissolve Reedy Creek—it promised bond purchasers that it would not.

What is the Reedy Creek Improvement District?

Reedy Creek is an independent special district—a type of Florida federal government entity that typically has a precise goal, such as working a stormwater or medical center process. These districts are often funded by classic property taxes, as nicely as expenses and rates related with the procedure they operate. Hunting at Reedy Creek’s enabling legislation, you could not recognize that the district functionally has only 1 landowner, as the district has a theoretically democratically elected board of supervisors and doesn’t point out the existence of Disney except to talk about the worth of tourism.

Reedy Creek has the powers of lots of specific districts rolled into one—the power to establish streets, the energy to establish a drainage process, the electric power to establish energy utilities, and more. But Reedy Creek also has special and extraordinary powers, in some ways around and earlier mentioned even metropolitan areas and counties. Just one of the district’s most-reviewed attributes is that it is exempt from all Orange County and Osceola County polices about constructing, zoning, design, basic safety, sanitation, and more—a attribute that the enabling act describes as “essential” to its needs.

Reedy Creek’s taxing energy is exceptional it can impose home taxes at a price three moments bigger than the highest quantity for cities and counties. This is in addition to exclusive routine maintenance and utility taxes. Reedy Creek has not been shy about employing these taxes—in the 2022 price range, it sets its property taxes at all-around 13.57 “mills,” with every single “mill” representing an annual cost one-one particular thousandth of the property’s assessed worth. This tax rate is greater than the maximum of 10 mills authorized for towns and counties. All around one particular-3rd of those people taxes are committed to just one factor: shelling out money owed.

Reedy Creek’s Financial debt

Reedy Creek, like other specific districts, can borrow money by issuing bonds, which can then be procured by buyers seeking for fastened payments. Just like any other personal debt, the phrases of the bond are centered on the particular bond contract at challenge. Reedy Creek is licensed to problem a couple diverse kinds of bonds, but the most crucial ones are individuals that promise to fork out from the residence taxes collected by the district and those people that fork out from utility system profits.

Reedy Creek’s bond choices quite substantially count on the district’s distinctive powers. Its home-tax-based mostly bonds focus on that the district can tax up to 30 mills and guarantee to tax at a charge large plenty of to pay the bonds. Its utility earnings bonds examine the district’s various powers to generate utility income and claims to repair expenses and charges enough to deliver adequate profits to pay out the bonds.

In authorizing Reedy Creek to challenge bonds, the Florida legislature involved a extraordinary statement—included in Reedy Creek’s bond offerings—regarding its possess promise to bondholders: “The State of Florida pledges to the holders of any bonds issued less than this Act that it will not restrict or alter the rights of the District to personal, acquire, construct, reconstruct, increase, keep, run or furnish the tasks or to levy and gather the taxes, assessments, rentals, costs, charges, tolls, fares and other rates supplied for herein … till all this sort of bonds with each other with desire thereon, and all fees and costs in relationship with any motion or proceeding by or on behalf of these types of holders, are completely satisfied and discharged.”

The bill dissolving Reedy Creek does not say what should take place to these debts, but a further statute does: By default, the community typical-objective government—the county—assumes the district’s personal debt, alongside with all of its property. This usually means that theoretically, Orange and Osceola counties will inherit upward of $1 billion in bond credit card debt.

The Contract Trouble

In case it was not evident, dissolving Reedy Creek “limited” and “altered” its capability to strengthen and manage its challenge and obtain its several expenses and taxes, and thus Florida would be violating its pledge to bondholders by dissolving Reedy Creek. Having said that, even without that specific language, the monthly bill dissolving Reedy Creek would have difficulties under contracts clauses of the Florida and U.S. constitutions.

Stating that the county assumes the debt is basic enough—actually figuring out what that usually means is a distinct tale. Reedy Creek spans both Orange and Osceola counties, so how will the personal debt be divided? Would it be by taxable price of assets or by the homes them selves? And how would that use to the utility revenue bonds when there is no easy way to divide which county the utilities relaxation in?

These tricky queries stage to the primary contractual problem. By dissolving Reedy Creek, the legislature primarily rewrote the guarantees made in the district’s bond offerings. In its place of bonds backed by a specific district with the electrical power to levy up to 30 mills in taxes, the home tax bonds will be backed jointly by two governments that can only generate a maximum of 10 mills in taxes. Alternatively of a unified utility method with special powers to charge a variety of fees, supported by exclusive taxing powers, utility revenue bonds will be jointly managed by two counties matter to more taxing and expending limitations.

Equally the U.S. and Florida constitutions place stringent restrictions on the government’s skill to impair its have contracts. Beneath the U.S. Structure, a point out can only impair an present deal if the impairment is affordable and essential to provide an crucial government goal. As early as 1866, the U.S. Supreme Court held that once a area governing administration issues a bond centered on an licensed taxing energy, the condition is deal-bound and are unable to eliminate the taxing electrical power supporting the bond. The Florida Constitution provides even increased defense from impairment of contracts.

With this legislation, the state of Florida has eliminated the govt entity that backed the many bonds although violating its own explicit assure not to do so. It is challenging to picture a way that the state could effectively argue that this did not violate its personal contractual obligations or unconstitutionally impair the contract amongst Reedy Creek and the bondholders. Florida could theoretically get rid of some of these contractual challenges by creating a large examine to prepay or “redeem” the bonds, but that is prevented by at minimum a person of the excellent bonds—2018’s utility profits bond prohibits redemption right up until October of 2029.


Florida only simply cannot promise to potential bondholders that it will not interfere with Reedy Creek, and then dissolve Reedy Creek. If Reedy Creek is at any time dissolved, it would be a monumental and challenging business even on a decades-extended timeline. The district has a 9-determine yearly finances for expenditures, and even ignoring its several money owed, it has a myriad of other contracts that someway would have to be assigned to and divided involving Orange and Osceola counties. However, the dissolution will have to hold out until finally all of its bonds are paid in comprehensive.

This write-up does not necessarily mirror the impression of The Bureau of Countrywide Affairs, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Regulation and Bloomberg Tax, or its house owners.

Writer Info

Jacob Schumer is an attorney dependent out of Maitland, Fla., with a follow concentrating on community governing administration-related issues.

We’d like to listen to your wise, original just take: Generate for Us