Tribunal dismisses Duncan man’s scenario from metropolis for home tax boost

A civil resolution tribunal has dismissed a case by a Duncan resident versus the Town of Duncan more than a big improve in his home taxes in 2022.

George Spong, who owns a dwelling on Marchmont Street in the municipality and represented himself in the proceedings, reported it’s unreasonable that his assets taxes increased 32.5 per cent in 2022, and claimed damages of $1,300 from the metropolis.

His property’s assessed benefit greater from $213,000 in 2021 to $361,000 in 2022.

But tribunal member Alison Wake, who wrote the CRT’s ruling, disputed lots of of Spong’s allegations and dismissed the scenario.

Connected Tale: HONEYMOON BAY Residence Proprietor States Evaluation ON DILAPIDATED Home WAY Far too High

Spong, who represented himself, reported he has no plans to appeal the CRT’s final decision.

“I found the whole matter was out of my league,” he claimed.

“I’m just grateful that the tribunal took the time to get to the bottom of my complaints. I promised myself that I would settle for the tribunal’s ruling, irrespective what it was, and move on and be beneficial about it.”

The town agreed Spong’s assets taxes increased substantially in 2022, from $600 in 2020 to $1,700 in 2022, but said that it applies its tax rate to all events in the property course equally, and it has no authority to modify an specific tax monthly bill.

Wake reported the town experienced argued that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to take into consideration Spong’s promises since only residence evaluation overview panels or the home assessment attraction board developed less than the Assessment Act could do so, and questioned the CRT to refuse to hear Spong’s circumstance.

On the other hand, it was established that the tribunal probably has jurisdiction to look at a declare for damages arising from a negligent or incorrect property tax evaluation.

“Mr. Spong has framed his declare as staying for damages arising from a negligent or incorrect home tax evaluation, and I uncover the CRT has jurisdiction to take into consideration a claim on this basis,” Wake mentioned.


But Wake claimed that while she accepts the city owes a responsibility of care to its taxpayers to properly compute house taxes, she uncovered that Spong has not proven that the city breached this responsibility in calculating his 2022 assets taxes.

She stated Spong relied on BC Evaluation documents, which he has not offered in proof, but which he claimed say that “property taxes are set by local govt authorities and are not dependent on property assessments.”

Wake explained she did not grant Spong the prospect to deliver this doc in evidence.

“This is because I uncover that, primarily based on the Neighborhood Charter, the home tax value is in point centered on the assessed price of the assets,” she explained.

“In distinction, it is the home tax level that should be set by the area federal government authority. Even if I settle for it is probable that BC Assessment has published a doc stating that property taxes are not dependent on home assessments, I locate the city is bound by the Local community Constitution, alternatively than by BCA’s informational documents. So, I give Spong’s submissions about the BCA doc no bodyweight.”

Wake also explained she does not concur with Spong’s argument that his residence tax boost of 32.5 for each cent was unreasonable.

Related Story: WATERFRONT Property IN YOUBOU UP 28%: BC Evaluation

“I come across Mr. Spong’s house taxes probable greater mainly because the percentage improve of his assets price was significantly higher (at 69 for every cent) than the ordinary improve of 34 for every cent,” she reported.

“I find Mr. Spong has not established that the city’s calculation of his residence taxes was incorrect.”

Spong also claimed that mayor and council ignored his worries and had been “not demonstrating leadership”, but Wake stated he experienced not offered proof of these allegations.

“The town submitted a letter that (Mayor Michelle Staples) sent to Mr. Spong in Might, 2023, which I uncover tries to deal with his issues and demonstrate how house taxes are calculated,” Wake concluded.

“I admit Mr. Spong’s frustration with the city’s conversation with him, or deficiency thereof, but discover he has not proven the town has acted negligently in addressing his worries. On the proof right before me, I find Mr. Spong has not established the town failed to satisfy its responsibility of care to properly determine his assets taxes. So, I find his statements should be dismissed.”